Seattle’s Emotional Sports Roller Coaster Shows Golden Age May Be Just on the Horizon

Monday night featured a pair of men named John Schneider who could directly impact, or already had, the future of Seattle sports. Who could, if the gods of games desired, usher in a golden era the likes of which Seattle and its athletic landscape has never before seen.

Neither John Schneider, in this instance, was the most famous of all John Schneiders. That would be the actor/country music singer John Schneider. To those of a certain age, especially outside of greater Seattle, Bo Duke from will always reign supreme—at least in the case of John Schneider supremacy. But to anyone under 50, living and breathing Seattle sports, Bo Duke was no hazard on Monday night.

Instead, a metropolis known for many things—but not any sort of sports supremacy, especially from multiple teams in multiple sports winning and building momentum at the same time—turned its eyes to two games and two John Schneiders and a future that looked bountiful. At least for anyone who dared to dream in a city where that hasn’t worked out well, not in sports, for, well, ever.

At 5:10 p.m. local time, the Mariners would begin Game 7 of the American League Championship Series against Toronto. John Schneider, baseball version, is at the end of his third season as the Blue Jays’ permanent manager after spending part of 2022 as the interim. If the Mariners toppled the baseball Schneider, they would advance to the first World Series in franchise history.

At 7 p.m., also local, the Seahawks would kick off a contest against the Texans. Their general manager, the football John Schneider, has raised expectations for Seattle’s football team all fall. A big win—on the sport’s grandest regular-season stage—would cement the notion that has been percolating. That these Hawks are the best version of a professional football team in town since, well, that Super Bowl they lost 10 years ago.

If both games featuring a John Schneider went well for the Emerald City’s sports denizens, then a true golden age of sports in Seattle could dawn, in full. To write that before Monday’s first pitch in Toronto or kickoff in Seattle was tantamount to daring those gods of games. Whomever they are, wherever they are, they’ve never treated Seattle kindly.

The Seahawks played their first football season in 1976. The Mariners played their inaugural baseball season in ’77. And yet, from the ’77 sports calendar through the 2024 iteration, both teams have never won a postseason game in the same season. Not even once.

Would that pattern take a step toward ending Monday night via two games featuring two John Schneiders? At 3:40 p.m. local, there is only hope from greater-Seattle sports fans. Hope that this time will be different. That a true golden age will dawn Tuesday morning, after the Hawks announced themselves as true Super Bowl contenders and the Mariners made their first World Series.

What could possibly go wrong?

2 p.m. PST: Golden age or missed golden opportunity?

The Seahawks’ John Schneider receives a text message from , laying out the premise for this story. He asks if he can call “on the way home.” Of course he can.

Schneider worked in this market in 2000 (as the Seahawks director of player personnel), left and returned in 2010 as the Hawks’ general manager and vice president. Which is to say that he understands the city, the history, what has been and what was possible Monday night, what is possible in the months and years ahead. The Seahawks don’t make back-to-back Super Bowls in the mid-2010s without him. They don’t do what the Mariners are trying to do—win that elusive first championship—without him, either.

As the starts of two critical games in two sports featuring two JS’s drew nearer, “golden age” needed to be defined. Consider the antithesis to this piece I wrote in 2008—where no less authority than Sir Mix-A-Lot described a putrid Seattle sports scene as —the baseline for one. A golden age of Seattle sports, then, would feature all local teams moving in the right direction, with at least two headed toward or at the top of their respective sports.

Next, research. In the Mariners’ 49-season baseball history, the club made the ALCS four separate times, including this season. The others: 1995, 2000 and ’01. In those long-ago football seasons, the Seahawks finished 8–8 (third in the AFC West), 6–10 (fourth) and 9–7 (second) respectively. They didn’t move to the NFC until ’02.

The Mariners didn’t make baseball’s playoffs from that historic 2001 season until ’22. The Seahawks didn’t make their playoffs from 1988, where they lost in the wild-card round, until ’99 (same round, also lost). They didn’t make the playoffs again until 2003—loss, same round—meaning their droughts coincided, directly, with the best seasons in Mariners history. The Hawks subsequent runs—’03 through ’07 under Mike Holmgren; ’12 through ’16 under Pete Carroll and, yes, the football John Schneider—fell squarely inside the Mariners’ two-decades-plus postseason drought, which grew to be the longest in professional sports.

When that mercifully ended, the Seahawks even made a playoff appearance the same season. They lost in wild-card round, played early in 2023, and haven’t been back since.

Seattle sports, in other words, could have nice seasons. Just not too many at the same time. Which prevented any golden age, however defined, from truly blooming.

2:40 p.m.: A city braces for heartbreak

Downtown Seattle bustled with magnitude, sports fandom and uncommonly high stakes for a Monday in mid-October. The highest, I’d argue, that this sports scene had ever held on a random weekday this late into any given year. The Seattle Storm had made the WNBA playoffs before being eliminated on Sept. 18. The Washington football program holds a 5–2 record as of this Monday, its only losses against traditional Big Ten powers in Ohio State (ranked No. 1 when UW hosted the Buckeyes late last month) and Michigan (yes, unranked but also last weekend and on the road). The Mariners were still playing baseball on Oct. 20, right as the Seahawks seemed to be rounding into midseason form.

Mariners fans congregated outside of T-Mobile Park ahead of Game 7, just as they did to celebrate a Game 5 victory (pictured above) last Friday. / Alika Jenner/Getty Images

I drove through the stadium district, around T-Mobile Park, which would host a watch party for Game 7 on Monday evening, and around Lumen Field, where the Hawks would kick off roughly two hours after the baseball started. I stopped to talk to anyone who seemed interesting, in light of two games and two JS’s on Monday night.

For once, the local sports scene was in mid-October conflict. There were Steve Largent jerseys among Cal Raleigh ones. One man stood waiting for the light near the Ken Griffey Jr. statue on First Avenue, wearing a No. 16 Tyler Lockett jersey and a Mariners ballcap. Vendors had already set up on Edgar Martinez Dr. S. or Occidental Ave. Local watering holes with televisions—I stopped inside four of them—each planned to show both games Monday night.

Parking twice meant those four stops and four attempted conversations with local sports fans. None would touch this golden age and whether it might dawn in the next seven hours or so. It was like no one dared jinx the possibilities. (At , we live with one of the most notable jinxes in sports. Perhaps the non-answers stemmed from that.)

Of note: On the drive back to the suburbs east of downtown Seattle, traffic thickened. As if everyone who worked downtown also understood Monday’s stakes. As if those who couldn’t swing a ticket for either stadium’s event on Monday night, surely weren’t going to miss either game on television.

2:57 p.m.: Seattle’s near-golden ages

Mid-stadium route, I sent a text message to Danny O’Neil, a friend and former colleague who, per my recollection, understood Seattle sports as well as anyone. His Substack always teaches me something about this landscape I didn’t know before. I asked for his take on my research, the golden age, those Monday night sports stakes extending far beyond the NFL’s loudest stadium.

For once.

O’Neil pointed out 2000, when the Mariners went to the ALCS and the football Huskies won the Rose Bowl on Jan. 1, 2001. He also noted 1995, when the M’s made the ALCS (for the first time ever)—and the 1995–96 Seattle Supersonics would advance to the NBA Finals. He wasn’t arguing those were that, only informing with what he knew.

Consider those years the best candidates for any golden age of Seattle sports. This is not that. The possibilities seem higher; the baseball-football momentum, without precedent; the entire landscape moving in the same direction, not just pieces.

4:06 p.m.: Seahawks’ John Schneider relationship with “special” in Seattle

Seattle’s John Schneider did call Monday. He was en route to Lumen Field for the Monday Night affair and willing to entertain questions on building sports momentum in Seattle and famous John Schneiders of all sports/standing. He pointed, right away, to 2010, when he came back to Seattle and Pete Carroll arrived and Seahawks moments without precedent were set in motion.

“O.K., we’re gonna have this stadium rocking, we’re gonna build this team,” the men who changed Seattle’s sports landscape told each other then.

Seahawks general manager John Schneider returned to Seattle hoping to tap into a dedicated group of sports fans. / Mark J. Rebilas-Imagn Images

They carried, the football Schneider says, the chip familiar to those steeped in West Coast football with them. There is no better time zone in which to watch football—to watch sports, really. Schneider had already noticed the franchise’s momentum culled from the Mike Holmgren–Tim Ruskell pairing from 2005 through ’09. Seattle’s JS had wanted to come back earlier than ’10. “I tried getting a shot [at GM, when the team hired Ruskell] really badly,” the football JS says. “Like, I wanted to get back [to Seattle], because of the people in the building and the fan base.”

He believed the Seahawks could carry the same heft that the Packers did in Green Bay, near where the football Schneider grew up and where he spent the bulk of his pre-Seahawks-GM career. “Watching the Mariners, the intensity of the fans is really what brings [those memories] back for me,” he says Monday. “That’s what drives us to do what we do, trying to make their team(s) incredible. I get that feeling watching the Mariners.”

For the Seahawks, notes the football JS, 2012 marked the season when seemed possible, even imminent. That wasn’t a Super Bowl team. But those Hawks did finish 11–5. They did make the postseason. Did batter their division’s winner, San Francisco, in the regular season’s penultimate game, winning 42–13. “I just remember thinking, at that time, we’re gonna beat San Francisco, we’re gonna go to Atlanta and we’re gonna beat those guys. These [Seahawks] are buying into what Pete’s preaching. They dig each other. This could be … .”

Like these Mariners in 2025.

5:18 p.m.: The Mariners game begins

In these John Schneider wars on Monday night, the Mariners struck first. Julio Rodríguez doubled to start the game and scored when Josh Naylor—already worthy of a Mariners statue?—sent him home. This, to Seattle sports fans, feels too good to be true.

Josh Naylor continued his impressive postseason for the Mariners with an RBI single in the first inning of Monday’s Game 7. / Nick Turchiaro-Imagn Images

Seattle’s John Schneider is not a Mariners expert. But he did catch a few games recently for the baseball team that plays in a stadium across the street in what’s known as SoDo—south of downtown—or Seattle’s stadium district.  He saw a team that played for each other; an elite everyman who could be rallied around in catcher Cal Raleigh and, potentially, a postseason catalyst similar to Marshawn Lynch for the Hawks in 2012.

“He was ours,” football JS says, referring to Lynch, while pointing to the M’s midseason acquisition of Naylor from Arizona in late July. “Players loved [Marshawn]. They didn’t want to let him down. I just see that from [Naylor].

“I could be totally wrong,” he adds.

5:37 p.m.: Blue Jays strike back

John Schneider’s Blue Jays, loaded with bats, even the score in the bottom of the first. But fold? Not these M’s. In the very next inning, two more batters reach base, and they’re moved by a bunt from J.P. Crawford into scoring position. In Seattle last week, Toronto put on a bunt clinic of sorts, especially in its Game 4 victory.

This turn toward artful baseball indicated that Seattle would not shrink under such stakes. But the set-up yielded no runs.

The Seahawks’ John Schneider has never met the Blue Jays’ John Schneider. The football JS, however, has met Bo Duke. As a fan, this marked a life highlight for the football general manager. It happened “about 10 years ago” when Bo/John attended a Hawks game amid Seattle’s football rebuild. Two John Schneiders spoke briefly that night in the tunnel at the football stadium.

“Wow, people really don’t like you on Twitter, man,” the actor/singer John Schneider told the John Schneider who built football teams. “They don’t like me, either,” the Bo Duke JS added.

As for the Blue Jays manager, the Seahawks exec says they do have mutual friends in common. All sounded the same theme, that his baseball managing counterpart is a “great guy, really good dude.”

6:01 p.m.: Mariners take the lead

Juuuuulllliiiiiooooo. The brightest, youngest star—he is 24; Raleigh, 28—in the Mariners’ suddenly budding constellation of baseball talent saw an 85-mph slider and swung that sweet, natural swing to give the M’s a 2–1 lead. His fourth home run this postseason traveled 423 feet into Mariners postseason lore.

Which, of course, is neither glorious nor expansive. At least for one more night.

6:40 p.m.: The Big Dumper goes yard

My 8-year-old boy yelled from the next room over. “Daddy, home run!” He was right. It’s from Raleigh, the Mariners’ MVP this season, to expand the lead to 3–1 in the fifth. Attempts were made to explain how unusual this concept is—Game 7, ALCS, real, actual cushion—but the boy knows only winning baseball. This is what he .

7:04 p.m.: Mariners hold the line

Was that Bryan Woo, pitching for the second time this series and since a late-season injury shelving? Yes. And did he really strike out Vladimir Guerrero Jr. to preserve that two-run lead?

Anything seemed possible at this point on Monday night.

7:32 p.m.: Disaster strikes

The Seahawks have taken a 7–0 lead across the street from the baseball stadium where Mariners fans watch Game 7 on the big screens. The roars volleyed back and forth.

Until! Bottom of the seventh, Game 7, Mariners perched nine perilous outs from the—have you heard?—first World Series appearance in franchise history. Woo was still on the mound. The Blue Jays put a runner on first, then runners on first and second. Out went Woo. To the plate came George Springer—the most booed of all the , as the 8-year-old calls them, because Springer played for the hated Astros before the Blue Jays, winning a World Series and WS MVP in 2017, in year 16 of the M’s drought, amid the yet-to-be-revealed sign-stealing scandal down in Houston.

His three-run home run gave Toronto its first lead Monday night. Score one for baseball John Schneider, who adeptly managed his pitching staff, starters and bullpen throughout this series. Mariners manager Dan Wilson, meanwhile, faced with increasingly difficult decisions for his tired bullpen Monday night, kept Woo in—and perhaps two batters too long.

Blue Jays outfielder George Springer blasted a three-run home run to give Toronto a late lead over the Mariners in Game 7. / Dan Hamilton-Imagn Images

Suddenly, the Mariners, in their first-ever ALCS Game 7, were down to their last six outs. Of the game, sure. But also for 2025.

Anyone who said that of course this would happen didn’t know the history. The Mariners had never reached such stakes. Win or lose, the magical season that was still counted. And yet, this close? Against guy?

The gods of games can, of course, be cruel.

7:40 p.m.

. After Crawford grounded out to short.

7:41 p.m.

. After Eugenio Suárez, Game 5 hero, struck out looking.

7:43 p.m.

. After Randy Arozarena also grounded out.

7:49 p.m.

About those gods. The boy had all but given up, consigned to the Blizzard that was marked either for his celebration or consolation prize. The Mariners’ bullpen appeared as tired as it should have been. In came Andrés Muñoz, Señor Smoke, as dependable a pitcher as exists in that Seattle bullpen. Two more runners. First and third. Disaster appeared imminent.

But! A line drive shot from a Blue Jays bat lasered into Nailor’s glove at first, enabling an easy double play that was anything but to enable escaping the eighth inning without any more runs added by Toronto.

7:55 p.m.

Top of nine. Three outs remaining in this magical 2025 season.

7:56 p.m.

.

7:58 p.m.

.

7:59 p.m.: Mariners go down swinging

Rodríguez strode to the plate. Raleigh stood in the on-deck circle. One strike. Two strikes. The count, 2–2. The count, full. The boy curled up in anticipation. Strike three. He sighed.

No shame in that. No shame in this Mariners season, nor what it projected next season and in others, near-term.

Cameras flashed to Rodríguez in the dugout. Tears welled in his eyes. The 8-year-old did not cry. His history doesn’t run deep enough yet.

“This is sad,” the 8-year-old says, wisely. “But they were close, so close, to history.”

The baseball John Schneider celebrated on his home field in Toronto, having just clinched the Blue Jays’ first World Series appearance since 1993. The Seahawks took a 14–0 lead across the street from an instantly dejected T-Mobile Park and would go on to win 27–19. Springer was on TV, detailing all the things that made him happy. Perhaps others threw up in their mouths right then.

Regardless, Monday night and the battle of John Schneiders may still end up as the dawn of the first true golden era for Seattle sports. That will be answered by the Seahawks this season and the entire landscape, Hawks and M’s included, in the years ahead.

If not, at least wait-’til-next-year is already the baseline. And signs for an unprecedented, all-around surge remain—young talent, all over; additional resources, in all places—just not with a World Series payoff Monday night.

“Can I turn on Netflix?” the boy asks. Of course. His winning baseball team has plenty of games ahead.

The clearest winner Monday night: John Schneiders.

Daily Dinger: Best MLB Home Run Picks Today (Bobby Witt Jr., Jurickson Profar Among Top Targets)

What’s better than picking the right player to hit a home run in a game?

There are few baseball bets that are more lucrative when they come through, as some players can be as high as 10/1 to hit a home run in a game on a given night. 

Tonight, there are a pair of players that I love to go deep, as they are facing pitchers that have been very prone to the long ball so far in the 2024 season. 

Home run props are tough to predict, but focusing on hitter matchups and the amount of home runs allowed by starters are a great place to begin. 

Best MLB Home Run Picks for Monday, June 24Jurickson Profar to Hit a Home Run (+650)Bobby Witt Jr. to Hit a Home Run (+340)

Jurickson Profar to Hit a Home Run (+650)

San Diego Padres outfielder Jurickson Profar has been great this season, posting a .319/.413/.484 slash line with 10 home runs. 

I’m surprised to see Profar all the way down at +650 to hit a home run, as Patrick Corbin has struggled mightily with the long ball in recent seasons. 

The Washington Nationals lefty has allowed 12 home runs in 15 starts this season, and Profar has solid numbers in his career against Corbin. The switch hitter has seven at bats against Corbin, posting a .429 batting average and .500 on-base percentage, although he hasn’t hit a home run against him. 

Could that change tonight?

Given Profar’s play this season and Corbin’s struggles (5.60 ERA), he’s worth a shot at +650 to go deep tonight. 

Bobby Witt Jr. to Hit a Home Run (+340)

Kansas City Royals star Bobby Witt Jr. is an MVP candidate in the American League, and he’s a great candidate to go yard on Monday night. 

The Miami Marlins are starting Roddery Muñoz, who has given up 11 home runs in just six appearances this season, including four games where he’s allowed multiple long balls. 

That sets up well for Witt, who has 12 home runs on the season – including 10 against right-handed pitching. 

Muñoz has a 5.76 ERA and 7.46 Fielding Independent Pitching this season, so I wouldn’t be shocked to see him roughed up by this Kansas City offense on Monday.

Braves Name Bench Coach Walt Weiss As New Manager

Walt Weiss was named the manager of the Braves, the team announced Monday. Atlanta parted ways with Brian Snitker after a disappointing season in 2025, and it opted to promote from within when homing in on his replacement.

Weiss has been the Braves’ bench coach since 2018. He had a 14-year playing career that spanned from 1987 to 2000, and spent his final three seasons in Atlanta. A shortstop, Weiss was a starter at the All-Star Game in 1998 and had 1,207 hits in his career. He won the World Series in 1989 as a member of the Athletics, and also won it with the Braves as the bench coach in 2021.

He’s previously served as the manager of the Rockies, where he was at the helm from 2013 to ‘16. He had a winning percentage of .437 in Colorado, failing to make the postseason in any of his four seasons with the team.

Weiss is the 49th manager in Braves’ franchise history, and he’ll inherit a talented roster that he’s plenty familiar with. The team has made the postseason in seven of the last eight years, and is just four years removed from a World Series title.

Mohammad Asif: 'I shook up the world. That's what I like to think about'

Sharp of memory, not short on ego, Mohammad Asif looks back at his short, splendid career, and at Pakistan’s attitudes towards fast bowling

Interview by Umar Farooq04-May-2020How to find Mohammad Asif? How to find someone who doesn’t care about being found, who doesn’t care what the media say or write about him, who doesn’t want to get his narrative out there? Who doesn’t do social media?Somewhere, recently, Kevin Pietersen had once again remarked that Asif was the most difficult bowler he faced in his career. Pietersen isn’t alone in saying this but he has said it more than others. And no Pakistani cricketer is more lamented than Asif. So I decided to find him and ask him about it. The phone number I had for him was switched off and WhatsApp wasn’t showing up anything either. I asked someone I suspected would have a contact for him – Salman Butt, with whom he will be forever linked – and sure enough, got a number. I was then told by others that Asif had moved to the US permanently (not true) and was stuck there at the moment because of the Covid-19 pandemic (true).ALSO READ: Ahmer Naqvi: The everlasting wiles of Mohammad Asif (2016)I sent him a WhatsApp message, introducing myself and asked for some time to chat. He replied the next day, initially suspicious. Why do I want to chat, what do I want to chat about? Why now? It took three nights – late nights – of chats with him, calls, messages and voice notes – to get him to agree. I wanted to talk about fast bowling, his career, his finest spells. He wanted to talk on his own terms and at first did so in the style of a tell-all exposé , giving me all kinds of amazing headlines and stories, none of which, of course, would be fit to publish. He wanted the truth out there, all of it, but it couldn’t happen.Three days later I caught up with him again and this time, managed to convince him to talk about what I wanted to talk about. He agreed.Do you have any regrets about the way your career ended?
Of course. My ambition was to finish my career on a better note and I do have regrets. But that’s a different story. I think whatever happened it had to happen and that’s okay. Everyone has regrets in their life and a few want to talk about them, but I think I am fine. Everyone makes mistakes and I did too.

“My job is not to scare batsmen but to make fools of them and then get them out”

Players had been indulging in fixing before me [in 2010] and even after me. But those before me are working with PCB and there are few after me still playing. Everyone was given a second chance and there are few who never got the same treatment [as me]. PCB never tried to save me regardless of the fact that I am the kind of bowler who was highly regarded by everyone in the world. But anyway I’m not sitting around brooding about the past or hung up on it.What happened is history. However much I played in my career, I made it count, (I shook up the world). That is more important for me to think about. Even today, so many years later, the best batsmen in the world still remember me and they talk about me. Just think how big the impact was that I had on the world. So this is what makes me proud – that there is a reason KP, AB de Villiers, Hashim Amla talk highly about me. That is what makes me happy.ALSO READ: Osman Samiuddin: The young fox (2007)But don’t you regret that you really could have established yourself as a genuine legend if your controversies hadn’t overshadowed and then cut short your career?
Yes, I could have ended up with a different standing without the controversies, but I am still somewhere with whatever I have done. Yes, I should have behaved better off the field. That is where I had issues. But I didn’t die of hunger then and I’m not going to die of hunger now either.I want to give the kids this message that when you cross the boundary line into the field, your ambition should be to do well for yourself and for your team. And when you cross the rope back towards the dressing room, you should go in with your head held high and no doubts about your performance. And even if you didn’t get a wicket, your figures should be good enough [for people] to acknowledge your contribution and effort.I was selfish as a bowler because I wanted to take wickets, and that was to help the team win. Being selfish isn’t bad if you’re playing your part for the team.Asif gets Pietersen in the 2006 Oval Test. “The reason why I probably am still haunting KP – for which he is talking about me every fourth day – was because I did test him as a bowler”•Getty ImagesYou did certainly leave an impression on people…Muddy [Mudassar Nazar] once asked me to bowl to someone at the NCA [National Cricket Academy in Lahore] as part of a trial. The guy I was bowling to, I asked if he had his guard on. He didn’t and I made sure he put one on. The very first delivery I bowled to him, he left on line, only for it to come back and hit him on his guard. Muddy Pa laughed at me and said, “You bastard, how the f**k do you have such control?”One time I was bowling in the nets at Gaddafi Stadium and Wasim Akram was there. He asks me how many balls I would take to get the batsman out. I said, third ball I’ll hit the stumps. The batsman was a lefty and he let my first two balls go, which were outswingers, and then he left the third one as well – but his stumps went flying, because this one came in, and I looked at Wasim and saw the amazement on his face.Even Mohammad Abbas, who said to Wasim Akram publicly in an interview on YouTube that he learnt a lot from me – he should’ve actually said that it’s you [Akram] who is my idol but instead he said it was me. Not a very smart move, because he didn’t realise that if he wants to have a long career, he’s better off saying Akram is his biggest influence and not me!ALSO READ: ‘The line’s the thing’ (2007)I proved myself not just once but repeatedly. I got the same batsmen out more than once, and it’s not like I bowled one fluke great delivery and never did it again. I kept doing it. With ball in hand I was in control. Moving the ball in and out wasn’t just a one-off thing. And I didn’t learn to do it in days. It took me years and I worked really hard for it.I do miss playing cricket. Everyone does. You ask Viki [Waqar Younis], Wasim Akram, they all do, but you are never going to play your whole life.

“You can’t break anyone with pace. Selectors think fast bowlers can blow any team away, but nobody really fears pace as such – or if they do then it is sustained pace”

You talked about Abbas. He has done well, in a way similar to you.
He is seriously good. I told him to increase his bowling speed by 5-6kph and he can easily make into the ODI team as well. But with his age now, at this stage, it might be tough for him.One of the basic problems we have in our system is that a lot of our selectors, over the years, had very minor and ordinary playing careers. For them, picking express fast bowlers is the only thing, because they probably struggled to handle really quick bowlers when they were playing, or didn’t play enough to understand the importance of bowlers like me and Abbas. They just judge a fast bowler on the basis of his pace, ignoring that fast bowlers come in many different categories: there are some who bowl really fast and there are some who take wickets. But in Pakistan, the instinct is that only a fast bowler with express pace can win you games. I wouldn’t know for sure but I’d guess that the times we played together, I had more wickets than Shoaib Akhtar [Asif took 15 wickets in the four Tests he played alongside Akhtar, who took eight.]You can’t break anyone with pace. Selectors think fast bowlers can blow any team away, but nobody really fears pace as such – or if they do then it is sustained pace. But the longer a batsman spends at the crease, the more that fear goes away. The real fear is of getting out. Phillip Hughes was so unfortunate and tragic because he got hit on the one unprotected spot, but the odds of it happening are very low. Our system remains inclined to looking for fast bowlers, but these days it seems like we’ve had more quantity than quality.There are quite a few in the current batch although they’re coming up without having played much cricket. Shaheen Afridi is a great find and right now you are playing him in every format, making him play everything. But at the end of the day when he stops performing, you’ll drop him and pluck another young kid out from nowhere. There are 20 to 25 bowlers in the range of 130 to 140kph, but in Test match cricket I don’t see pace. A fast bowler who can take a ten-wicket haul is the quality I’m looking for. How many fast bowlers have taken ten wickets for Pakistan since 2010? Only Abbas after me.Asif on extracting movement out of a flat pitch in Kandy in 2006, where he took 11 wickets: “Either I was in a hurry or probably they [Sri Lankan batsmen] were in a hurry”•AFPBut these days, isn’t pace important on flatter pitches in some countries?
All you have to do is understand your limits and play within those. I played well within mine. I’m not saying you don’t need a really fast bowler in a team. Some teams need an express bowler who can push a batsman on to the back foot. I bowled within my limits and this is what worked for me. I’m not saying you have to have an entire team of bowlers like myself and that this is the only successful formula. My job is not to scare batsmen but to make fools of them and then get them out. Bowlers like myself are essential in the team, but bowlers like myself often need more patience and time to prove our worth. But unless you’re going over 140-plus, people are somehow never convinced.What did you make of Mohammad Amir retiring from Test cricket at the age of 27?
I curse the PCB for how they rescued his career. But it was his obligation to help Pakistan cricket in a tough situation and he should have stayed, especially when they had helped him return. Anyway, it’s the PCB’s decision to let him go, but if he is meant to leave Test cricket at this age, it really is a curse upon those who fought so hard to bring him back. And did anyone ever take Amir’s name, saying he was the toughest bowler to handle? Definitely no.ALSO READ: Rahul Bhattacharya: Foxes lizards and other bowlers (2010)It’s about how compassionate you are. If the PCB invested so much in you then it’s your duty to rescue them in Test cricket. If they had done the same with me, then I’d still be available to rescue Pakistan in Test cricket for the next two years. I know there are fitness standards, but I can work that out and whatever is required I can do it.What do you remember as the best spells of your career?
I enjoyed playing cricket to the core. I really loved it and that means that I loved every spell I bowled, because each spell had a story, a context and purpose to it. If for instance in some spell I wasn’t getting a wicket, I was still learning something important about the batsman and how to get his wicket next time.

“With ball in hand, I was in control. Moving the ball in and out wasn’t just a one-off thing. And I didn’t learn to do it in days. It took me years and I worked really hard for it”

So my all spells were good, but if I had to narrow it down, I’d remember the Karachi Test against India. The biggest batting line-up of the time. I remember Shoaib Akhtar in the dressing room worrying about how we’d get them out. I just got them out and showed him. So that particular game I remember, and then that Kandy Test where I don’t really remember who but either Umar Gul or Rao Iftikhar Anjum came to me and asked how the hell I was making the ball swing, when for them the ball wasn’t moving at all. Anyway, I don’t know, either I was in a hurry or probably they [Sri Lankan batsmen] were in a hurry (). Those 11 wickets were fun.I tell you one thing – I never had to “make” [tamper with] a ball. Otherwise there are bowlers – some regarded as the greatest – who just wait for the ball to go rough so that it starts reversing. [Asif bowled in the Oval Test that Pakistan forfeited over allegations that they had tampered with the ball.] There were so many figures you will find with the team at 200 for 1 and suddenly they are 250 all out. But I always had taken wickets with the new ball and upfront. The reason why I probably am still haunting KP – for which he is talking about me every fourth day – was because I did test him as a bowler. He was a great batsman to bowl to and getting that kind of wicket makes you feel equally great. A tail-end wicket never really gave me the same satisfaction.Any plans to get into coaching? I’m sure there are many who would want to learn your skills.
I am working here in the US, between New Jersey, [Washington] DC and Pittsburgh. There are some wonderful academies here and I’ve also been playing some league matches. It’s a great opportunity and facilities here, with a lot of Indians and Pakistanis who want to learn cricket away from their native country. I will go back to Pakistan as well and work there if required but our circuit has no space at the moment. There are players from ’90s still cramping the system, so no chance for us. I had plans to set up my own academy but this pandemic has come in the way for now. But I’m determined to do something and pass on to kids what I know.

Which batsman had the longest streak of single-digit scores in Tests?

And which bowler took at least one wicket in 52 consecutive innings?

Anantha Narayanan08-Aug-2020As I had mentioned in my previous piece, it’s now time for a fun and wacky article, this one on streaks in Test cricket. You might have come across quite a few either in ESPNcricinfo’s huge collection of records, in Steven Lynch’s excellent weekly Q&A columns, or in features written by members of the site’s stats team. But I’ll venture to say that this might be the first time you will see all these 40 streaks in Test cricket grouped in one place.Player combinationSame 11 players: England played the same team in six Tests in 2008. The XI comprised of: Andrew Strauss, Alastair Cook, Michael Vaughan (c) , Kevin Pietersen, Ian Bell, Paul Collingwood, Tim Ambrose (wk), Stuart Broad, Ryan Sidebottom, James Anderson, and Monty Panesar. England won four and drew two with this XI. South Africa (on five separate occasions), Australia (three times), England (one other occasion) and West Indies (once) have played the same team in five consecutive Tests.Same opening pair: This is a rarely mentioned streak. Justin Langer and Matthew Hayden opened in 91 consecutive innings between November 2001 and October 2005. They averaged 51.17 runs per completed partnership during this run. After the ICC Test in 2005, Hayden opened with Michael Hussey and other batsmen. Strauss and Cook had two opening streaks of 43 and 45 innings, averaging 43 runs across those streaks. These were separated by two Tests against Bangladesh in which Michael Carberry and Jonathan Trott opened, with Cook. Surprisingly, Jack Hobbs and Herbert Sutcliffe only opened together in 11 successive innings. Hobbs opened quite a few times with Wilfred Rhodes, and Sutcliffe with Percy Holmes.Same opening bowlers: The established fast-bowling partnerships do not rule the roost here. Kapil Dev and Karsan Ghavri opened the bowling in 45 consecutive innings between November 1978 and January 1981. In Lahore, in the Test before their streak began, Sunil Gavaskar opened with Kapil, and in the Test after it ended, in Melbourne, Dilip Doshi opened with Kapil. Anderson and Broad opened in 39 consecutive innings between 2017 and 2018. Pakistan and West Indies generally played musical chairs with their new-ball combinations. Their best pairs were Wasim Akram and Waqar Younis (16 innings) and Malcolm Marshall and Joel Garner (28 innings) respectively.ResultsWins: Between October 1999 and February 2001, Australia won 16 Tests in a row, 11 at home Tests and five away. This streak was ended by India in the Laxman-Dravid-Harbhajan Test in Kolkata. Before their streak started, Australia played out two rain-hit draws in Sri Lanka.

Between the Boxing Day Test of 2005 and the New Year Test in 2008, Australia again won 16 Tests in a row, once again 11 at home and five away. Included in this streak are a two-wicket win and a three-wicket win. This streak was ended by India in Perth, where they beat Australia by 72 runs. Before this sequence, Australia drew a hard-fought Test against South Africa.In 1984, West Indies won 11 Tests in a row, three at home and eight away. This streak was bookended by dominating near-win draws against Australia.Innings wins: In the 2019-20 home season, India won four Tests by an innings. On no fewer than 15 occasions have teams registered three consecutive wins by an innings. It should be noted that the recent trend, post 2001, is to not enforce the follow-on, and teams end up with wins by huge run margins. Many of these could be innings wins in any other era.Draws: West Indies drew ten Tests in a row between March 1971 and March 1973. But let me make it clear: this was not yet the famed West Indies side. The pace attack was pedestrian, with Andy Roberts, the first of those great fast bowlers, still a year away from making his debut.Losses: This is on expected lines. Bangladesh lost 21 Tests in a row between November 2001 and February 2004 – 12 of them by an innings. A novice team, taken to the cleaners by the experienced teams. Zimbabwe have had streaks of 11 and ten losses in the past 20 years.Innings defeats: Bangladesh, twice (once in 2001-02 and once in 2004) and Zimbabwe, in 2005, lost five consecutive matches by an innings. Zimbabwe’s sixth loss was by ten wickets.TossesToss wins: Let me clarify that these toss wins/losses are from the team’s point of view and not the captain’s. From October 1998 to September 1999, Australia won 12 tosses in a row, seven at home and five away. Australia won five, drew three and lost four of these Tests. From January 1960 to June 1961, England won 12 tosses in a row, five at home and seven away. England won four, drew seven and lost one of these Tests. There have been six occasions when teams won the toss in eight consecutive Tests.Toss losses: India had the misfortune to lose ten tosses in a row from December 2009 to October 2010. There were six home Tests and four away Tests. India won seven, drew one and lost two of these Tests. The last two wins were achieved despite Australia crossing 400 on each occasion. There were seven occasions when teams lost the toss in nine consecutive Tests.Teams400-plus scores: In the 1986-87 season, India went past 400 in six consecutive innings. The scores were 517 for 5, 676 for 7, 451 for 6, 400, 527 for 9 and 403. Surprisingly (or not), India won only two of the Tests. Australia, twice (1938 and 2003), and India, again in 2010, scored five consecutive 400-plus totals.Sub-100 scores: In their first Test, South Africa scored 84 and 129. Then the might of Australia and England settled on them like a shroud. They did not reach 100 in their next six innings. The sequence was 47, 43, 97, 83, 93 and 30. All the matches were defeats to England. New Zealand, in 1958, and India, in 1952, had sequences of three sub-100 innings.Opening partnerships of above 100: Four teams share a sequence of three 100-plus opening partnerships: England, in 1925 and 1947, Pakistan in 2003, and Australia in 2015.Capturing all ten wickets: England took all the opposing team’s wickets no fewer than 37 times between March 1885 and July 1893. Australia achieved it 33 times during their golden 16-win run in the 1999-2001 period.CaptainsThis is a tricky bit of analysis. There are two type of streaks. A player captains his team in X Tests and then does not play in a few matches; “X” is one type of streak. And then he comes back and continues to captain, say, for a total of Y matches; this is another streak. “X” is from a team’s point of view while “Y” is from the player’s point of view. For “X”, the key is “an unbroken sequence for both team and player”. This is the more common definition. For “Y”, the key is “as long as he played, he was the captain”.Captain – Team: Allan Border captained Australia in 93 consecutive Tests from December 1984 to March 1994. His results were 32-39-22 (W-D-L). Using a 2-1-0 points allocation, Border had a Result Index of 55.4% (103 points out of a maximum of 186). Ricky Ponting captained Australia in 73 consecutive Tests from November 2004 to December 2010. His Result Index was 69.9% (45-12-16).Captain – Player: Graeme Smith captained South Africa in 108 consecutive Tests he played from April 2003 to March 2014. Smith’s Result Index was 61.6% (53-27-28). Border’s run of 93 Tests has already been chronicled. Stephen Fleming had a run of 80 Tests, with a Result Index of 50.6%, Ponting 77 Tests (70.8%), and Clive Lloyd 74 Tests (66.2%).

Winning Captain – Team: Ponting won 16 consecutive Tests as captain. This was during Australia’s golden run in 2008. During their other golden run, Steve Waugh captained in the first 12 Tests, then Adam Gilchrist captained successfully against West Indies in Adelaide, before Waugh took over again to complete the run.Winning Captain – Player: Ponting’s 16 consecutive Tests as a winning captain is followed by Steve Waugh’s 15 consecutive wins. Clive Lloyd had a run of 11 successful Tests in 1984.Draws by captain: John Reid drew nine successive Tests as captain from February 1964 to March 1965. Nari Contractor, in 1962, and Garry Sobers, in 1973, drew eight successive Tests as captains.Losing captain: Khaled Mashud lost ten successive Tests as captain from December 2001 to December 2002. Khaled Mahmud, who succeeded him, fared slightly better, losing nine in a row. Habibul Bashar, who took over the sinking ship, lost one Test, was lucky to save a Test because of rain and finally managed to save a fully played out Test. Those were the early days in Test cricket for Bangladesh.BatsmenConsecutive hundreds: This is a very well-known streak. Everton Weekes had a streak of five hundreds in 1948. His sequence of scores was 141, 128, 194, 162 and 101. This streak has remained a record for the past 70-plus years. It is interesting to note that his next score was 90. Jack Fingleton, in 1936, Alan Melville, from 1939 to 1947, and Rahul Dravid, in 2002, had streaks of four 100-plus innings.

Consecutive 90s: Clem Hill, in 1902, had a cruel sequence of 99, 98 and 97, missing three hundreds by a total of six runs. Fifteen batsmen had sequences of two nineties. It is interesting to note that there is just a single score of 99 in these 30 scores in the 90s. Apart from Hill, Frank Woolley, Gordon Greenidge (twice) and Mahela Jayawardene had dual nineties in a single Test.Consecutive 50-plus scores: Weekes continued his run of five hundreds with innings of 90 and 56. This completed the record streak of seven fifties. Just look at his next two innings – 48 and 52. He missed an amazing streak of nine consecutive fifties by two runs. However, this time he has to share his record. Kumar Sangakkara had a streak of seven 50-plus scores in 2014. His sequence of scores was 75, 319, 105, 147, 61, 79 and 55. His aggregate of 841 runs is the highest in this group. But this does not end here.Four other batsmen share this record of seven consecutive fifties. Andy Flower (2001), Shivnarine Chanderpaul (2007), Chris Rogers (2015) and KL Rahul (2017) had similar streaks. Flower’s previous innings, before the start of the streak, was 48.Unbeaten in innings: There is a crowd of six batsmen sharing nine occurrences of three consecutive unbeaten innings (of scores of 50 and above). Out of these six batsmen, two are worth delving into a little deeper. Sachin Tendulkar had innings of 241*, 60* and 194* in 2004 and accumulated 495 runs in these three innings. Surprisingly, Tendulkar was out for single figures in the next six innings. (Perhaps the declaration in Multan when he was on 194 put him off.) Chanderpaul achieved this hat-trick streak four times in his career (2002, 2004, 2008, 2014). The other batsmen are Ken Mackay (1958), Brian McMillan (1997), Jacques Kallis (2002) and Ross Taylor (2016).Now we move on to the other end of the spectrum.Single-digit scores: For batsmen who averaged over 20 in their careers, Reid, in 1954, had a wretched run of ten single-digit scores. The telephone-number sequence was 0, 3, 6, 1, 9, 7, 6, 0, 3 and 1. That is the calling code for Sonapur in Assam and Erfurt in Germany. Maybe the paucity of good replacements kept him in the side. His next innings was a top-quality 135 against South Africa in Cape Town. Alan Knott (1977-80), Mohinder Amarnath (1983) and Kapil Dev (1981) had sequences of eight single-digit scores.Zeroes: Among batsmen who averaged over 20 in their careers, the bespectacled Pankaj Roy had a quartet of zeros during the 1952 tour of England while facing the the express pace of Fred Trueman and the swing of Alec Bedser. He had previously made another zero and scores of 35 and 19 for Roy in the series. Mark Waugh made four consecutive zeros in Sri Lanka in 1992 while facing a total of 12 balls. Three of the dismissals were to bowlers whose names did not start with the letter M.Bowled dismissals: Jimmy Sinclair of South Africa was bowled in seven consecutive innings in 1910. His scores were 28, 3, 0, 12, 22, 10 and 19. Tip Snooke of South Africa was also bowled in seven consecutive innings with scores of 7, 9, 2, 16, 23, 8 and 20. Three other batsmen have a six-innings streak of bowled dismissals, the most recent being Alec Stewart in 1994.Run-out dismissals: John Jameson of England was run out in three consecutive innings in his first two Tests. His scores were 28, 82 and 16. He was then dropped and played in only two more Tests. As many as 55 players have a two-innings streaks of run-outs.BowlersTen-wicket hauls in a match: Who else but Muttiah Muralitharan? The master magician dominates the bowling streaks. It is interesting to note that of the 192 Test bowlers who have captured 100 or more wickets, only 26 bowlers have taken ten in a match at least four times. And of these 192, 63 have never taken ten in a match. This set of numbers puts Murali’s performances in perspective.He has taken ten wickets in a match in four consecutive Tests twice in his career. The first instance was in victories between August and November 2001 – 11 for 196, 10 for 111, 11 for 170 and 10 for 135. The next instance was between May and August 2006 – 10 for 115, 11 for 132, 10 for 172 and 12 for 225. Sri Lanka lost the first of those four Tests, but won the next three. Claire Grimmett finished his illustrious career with three ten-wickets hauls in 1936. The sequence was 10 for 88, 10 for 110 and 13 for 173. That was some exit.Eight-wicket hauls in a match: I have determined that taking eight wickets in a match more often than not leads to Test wins. Yasir Shah leads this illustrious list with five successive hauls of eight or more wickets in a match between April and October 2017 – 8 for 154, 9 for 177, 8 for 218, 8 for 171 and 8 for 231. Note how generous Yasir has been in terms of runs conceded. It did not help Pakistan much since they lost three of these Tests. Then we have the master, Murali, who has achieved this streak no fewer than five times. In addition to the two sequences of four ten-wicket hauls, he achieved this again during 2000, 2002 and 2006. Charlie Turner and Sydney Barnes also had four such sequences during 1888 and 1914.Five-wicket hauls in a innings: Turner achieved a streak of six successive innings in which he captured five or more wickets, in 1888: he had a sequence of 5 for 44, 7 for 43, 5 for 27, 5 for 36, 6 for 112 and 5 for 86. Tom Richardson (1896), Alec Bedser (1953) and Shane Shillingford (2013) had dream runs of five five-wickets per innings spells.Four-wicket hauls in an innings: I have included four-wicket hauls since it is more valuable than scoring a hundred. Murali had a streak of nine consecutive innings of four-wicket hauls between December 2001 and May 2002. Waqar Younis had a streak of nine innings of four-wicket captures between April 1993 and February 1994. Turner had a streak of eight such innings.Innings with at least one wicket: I am very strict about this streak. If a bowler bowled a ball, it is taken as a spell. That is how it should be when determining streaks. Murali had a run of 52 consecutive innings in which he captured at least one wicket – between July 2002 and April 2006. He had another run of 49 innings in which he captured at least one wicket – between December 1999 and June 2002. Unfortunately in between these two streaks, he had a spell of 2-0-17-0 that broke the sequence. Otherwise it would be 102 successive innings with at least one wicket. Bishan Bedi had such a sequence of 42 innings from July 1971 to January 1977. Murali, Dennis Lillee and Waqar had streaks of 41 successful spells.

WicketkeepersFive dismissals in a match: Brad Haddin had a golden run of six Tests, between January 2012 and August 2013, in which he dismissed five or more batsmen. He dismissed 36 batsmen during this run. He dismissed four batsmen in the Test before and four and five batsmen in the two Tests afterwards. Geraint Jones matched this sequence of six Tests in 2006, dismissing 35 batsmen during this run. Wally Grout and Adam Gilchrist had five such Tests each during 1961 and 2004 respectively.PlayersConsecutive Tests: Cook had a sequence of 159 consecutive Tests. He scored 60 and 104 not out in his debut Test in Nagpur in 2006. Then he made 17 and 2 in Mohali. He did not play the Mumbai Test; that followed, but came back to the team at Lord’s and played in England’s next 159 Tests. Border played his first Test at the MCG in 1978. He scored 29 and 0. In the next two Tests his scores were 60*, 45*, 11 and 1. He was inexplicably dropped for the next Test, but came back to the MCG and played in Australia’s next 153 Tests. These two are Bradmanesque distances away from the other batsmen. Gavaskar played in 106 consecutive Tests and Mark Waugh in 107 Tests.

Consecutive Tests through their entire career: Note the subtle difference. These players were never dropped and never missed a single Test. Brendon McCullum played 101 consecutive Tests, which formed his entire career. Similarly, Gilchrist played in 96 Tests, which was his entire career. Real giants indeed – on either side of the Tasman Sea.Miscellaneous triviaTest cricket is 143 years old. An almost perfect halfway mark can be found on August 18, 1948, the day Don Bradman said farewell to Test cricket. A very memorable day indeed. The halves are just over 71 years long. If one compares the two halves, 303 Tests were played in the first half and over 2087 Tests in the second half. The first half saw five triple-hundred scores and the second, 26. There were two scores of 299, one in each half. Surprisingly, there were six 15-wicket match hauls in the first half and six in the second half. There were two team innings of 900-plus, one in each half. There were two scores of 30 or lower in the first half and one in the second half. In all these occurrences, the first half seems to take the lead. The 400, 456 and ten wickets in an innings (twice) are the pluses for the second half.There have been three long breaks in Test cricket. The First World War saw a break of 2483 days. The Second World War saw a break of 2411 days. And now, the Covid-19 enforced break lasted 127 days. We necessarily have to exclude the initial years when the first five Tests were played in 1877, 1877, 1879, 1880 and 1882. Regular schedules started after that.The longest-standing important records are as follows: The 81 run-aggregate in two innings record – the lowest in a Test when the batting team has lost 20 wickets – by South Africa has stood for 31,994 days and counting
The 26-run innings score record by New Zealand – the lowest in an all-out innings – has stood for 23,877 days and counting
Nineteen wickets in a match by Jim Laker has stood for 23,387 days and counting
456 runs in a Test by Graham Gooch has stood for 10,967 days and counting
952 runs – the record innings total by Sri Lanka has stood for 8404 days and counting
400 runs in an innings by Brian Lara has stood for 5961 days (12/4/2004) and countingOn the other hand:The last two-day Test was played around 790 days back (in June 2018)
The last 300 was scored around 250 days back (in November 2019)
The last Test hat-trick came around 180 days back (in February this year)This shows that triple-hundreds and hat-tricks are always around the corner. But maybe not two-day Tests. However, no one is going to take 20 wickets in a Test or score 401 in an innings in a hurry. No team is going to fold up for 25, although Australia desperately tried to achieve this at Newlands a few years back.No bowler has taken 18 wickets in a Test. No bowler has conceded 198 runs in a Test spell. Similarly no batsman in Test cricket has scored 229. No team has won by eight or nine or 15 or 43 runs. The most frequented hundred-plus score is 100. It has been reached 161 times. That may be because of teams declaring soon after their batsman reaches 100. It is no wonder that the score of zero has occurred no fewer than 10,601 times (12.5% – one out of eight innings) and 1477 of these were unbeaten zeros.If any reader suggests a streak I’ve missed and I think that is a good one, I will incorporate those.My next feature will be streaks in one-day cricket. The overall structure will be the same, but some aspects of the game special to ODIs will also be incorporated.

RCB go from cruise control to heavy turbulence

Like every year, the team’s fortunes appear to be sinking and swimming with the form of Kohli and de Villiers

Saurabh Somani01-Nov-2020On October 21, the world looked rosy for the Royal Challengers Bangalore. They had seven wins from 10 matches in IPL 2020, were jointly at the top of the points table with Delhi Capitals, and a place in the playoffs seemed a formality.Like the teenager who suddenly finds pocket money running dry at month end though, the Royal Challengers are now scrambling. They are still second on the points table, but haven’t added to their points tally while suffering three consecutive defeats. Their net run-rate has swan-dived from a positive 0.182 to a negative 0.145 in the space of three games.And yet, having sunk to three defeats, if they can string together three wins now, they’ll be IPL champions. Win against the Delhi Capitals in their final league match, win the first qualifier against Mumbai, win the final.”It’s a terrible feeling to lose three in a row, you never want to do that,” AB de Villiers said after their latest defeat, to Sunrisers Hyderabad on Saturday. “But that is the nature of this tournament, anything can happen. If you lose three in a row, you can win three in a row as well.”There has been a pattern to the Royal Challengers wins and losses though, one which they’ll want to examine to achieve that three-game winning streak.In each of the seven games they have won, including the Super Over win against the Mumbai Indians, at least one of Virat Kohli or de Villiers have hit a half-century. The only exception is their most-recent win, when the Kolkata Knight Riders could muster only 84 for 8 batting first, not leaving an opportunity for a half-century from either man.While Devdutt Padikkal has also scored runs in the Royal Challengers’ wins, his contributions have been more support acts. In wins this season, Kohli averages 91.00 at a strike rate of 132.52. For de Villiers, those figures are 123.00 at 203.00. In losses, Kohli’s average drops to 26.33 and his strike rate to 107.48. The fall is steeper for de Villiers, with 19.50 and 115.84.In contrast, Padikkal’s figures in victories – 42.57 at 125.21 – don’t fall as drastically in defeats, 20.66 and 131.91. That lower strike rate in victories is an indicator of Padikkal’s role in holding one end up while Kohli and de Villiers have led the charge.In spite of having attempted to plug that gap at nearly every auction for the last four years, the fortunes of the Royal Challengers are sinking and swimming with the form of their two star batsmen. When they perform spectacularly, it leads to victories. When they fail, there seems to be no one to pick up that slack.BCCIThey seemed to have got that covered this year, having bought Aaron Finch, having invested in the promising young Josh Philippe, and with Moeen Ali already in the ranks. None of the three has had any great success in the limited, and not-so-limited chances they’ve had.Loss of form, especially in T20 cricket, is sometimes as ephemeral as a qualifying spot in your sights. Batsmen see failure more often than success in the format. But given their continued dependence on Kohli and de Villiers, the choices the Royal Challengers made against the Sunrisers were curious.Their previous loss, to Mumbai, had come about when the middle order failed to launch from an excellent start. The response against the Sunrisers was to cut the batting further and strengthen the bowling.Sharjah has already shown ample evidence of its pitches slowing down as IPL 2020 has gone on, with the 200-plus totals of its initial days not being achieved any longer. And yet, the Royal Challengers went in with four seamers. A fit-again Navdeep Saini was a natural part of their best XI, but they also brought in Isuru Udana, while leaving Ali on the bench.It meant the batting after de Villers, who came in at No.4, read: Washington Sundar, Gurkeerat Singh Mann, Chris Morris and Udana. That’s arguably among the weakest middle orders a team has had this season. Morris is the only one with a T20 strike rate over 130, and none of them average over 25.For a team that needs a bit of middle order heft, it was a surprising choice. The middle overs have been a period of struggle for the Royal Challengers, and with all teams having played 13 matches, their batsmen’s strike rate in that period (overs 7 to 16) is the worst in the league at 113.29. They have been lifted at the death by de Villiers, but the sluggishness in the middle has contributed to more than one defeat.Kohli would later say that he thought the team “weren’t brave enough with the bat throughout the innings” – but bravery with the bat is a natural consequence of skillsets. A Moeen Ali might be capable of being braver than an Isuru Udana because he has greater range, a greater ability to negotiate top bowling, a quicker eye, surer footwork.De Villiers pointed to the dismissals of Philippe and himself, five balls apart, as the turning point, though he maintained that the team was well balanced.”The turning point was probably when Josh and I got out back to back, which cost us about 20 to 30 runs,” de Villiers said. “That put a lot of pressure on our middle order.”We had a very good balanced team. We felt that was the right balance to go with. We had two frontline spinners, four seamers, lots of options with the ball. We have a very good batting line-up which didn’t score enough runs today, that’s what it comes down to.”That pressure was felt more keenly with the particular batting line-up the Royal Challengers chose to go with.They could still win three in a row – who would bet against a hot streak from Kohli or de Villiers, or both? But a selection that gives an opportunity for greater middle order support will increase their chances of doing that.

IPL 2021 auction: Who will Mumbai Indians, the Royals, the Royal Challengers and the Sunrisers Hyderabad target?

Will Mumbai get the fast bowler they want? Will RCB finally find back-up for Kohli and de Villiers?

Nagraj Gollapudi and Gaurav Sundararaman17-Feb-2021Part 1 of the previewMumbai IndiansWith seven slots left and a small purse of INR 15.35 crore, defending champions Mumbai Indians must play their cards smartly at the auction table.There are three gaps Mumbai would want to plug more than any other. First, get at least one, if not two, overseas fast bowlers. Having released James Pattinson and Nathan Coulter-Nile, Mumbai only have one overseas quick in Trent Boult. In addition, they could also look for a back-up allrounder for Kieron Pollard. Mumbai are also likely to be on the lookout for a back-up wristspinner to Rahul Chahar, who struggled in IPL 2020 and wasn’t in the playing XI for the final.ESPNcricinfo LtdFirst XI: 1 Rohit Sharma, 2 Quinton de Kock, 3 Suryakumar Yadav, 4 Ishan Kishan, 5 Hardik Pandya, 6 Krunal Pandya, 7 Kieron Pollard, 8 Rahul Chahar, 9 Trent Boult, 10 Jasprit Bumrah, 11 An overseas fast bowler.Key gaps: At least one overseas fast bowlerPotential picks: Jhye Richardson, Riley Meredith, Jason Behrendoff, Kyle Jamieson, Nathan-Coulter Nile, Arjun TendulkarBack-up wristspinner/fingerspinner Piyush Chawla, Harbhajan Singh, Khrievitso KenseBack-up allrounder for Kieron Pollard: Nathan Coulter-Nile, Shivam DubeRajasthan RoyalsKumar Sangakkara, the new team director of the Royals, has his task cut out. The Royals, who last made the playoffs in 2018, would be on the lookout for one fast bowler, one specialist batsman, and one allrounder. The weak link for the Royals has been a good support cast for Jofra Archer as well as a middle-order batsman who can play the finisher’s role. Both Steven Smith and Robin Uthappa struggled in those roles in IPL 2020. It will not be a surprise if the Royals buy back Smith cheap as experience always helps, but with a strong purse of over INR 34 crore, the franchise can’t be shy about raising the paddle to top price if they believe a name is worth it.ESPNcricinfo LtdCurrent first XI: 1 Sanju Samson, 2 Ben Stokes, 3 Jos Buttler, 4 David Miller, 5 Riyan Parag, 6 Rahul Tewatia, 7 Mahipal Lomror, 8 Jofra Archer, 9 Shreyas Gopal, 10 Jaydev Unadkat, 11 Kartik TyagiKey gaps: One fast bowler, one allrounder, one batsmanPotential picks: Steven Smith, Jason Roy, Dawid Malan, Alex HalesBack-up allrounder: Shivam Dube, Glenn Maxwell, Chris Morris, Moeen AliBack-up overseas fast bowler: Naveen ul Haq, Jhye Richardson, Jason Behrendorff, Kyle JamiesonRoyal Challengers BangaloreThe side led by Virat Kohli has an urgent need to fill up more than one vacant spot in the first XI. After releasing the likes of Chris Morris, Aaron Finch and Moeen Ali, the Royal Challengers’ focus will be on finding batsmen and allrounders for their top and middle order. That has been a long-standing problem for the franchise, for which they have tried to find remedies over several seasons, usually without much success.They will once again look for a solution to reduce the dependency on their two best batsmen: AB de Villiers and Kohli. With the second-highest purse in the 2021 auction (INR 35.9 crore), the Royal Challengers could target a few big names, including Glenn Maxwell and Shakib Al Hasan, in addition to finding an Indian batsman who can play the role of a finisher in the middle order. This should be a busy auction for the franchise.ESPNcricinfo LtdCurrent first XI: 1 Devdutt Padikkal, 2 Josh Philippe, 3 Virat Kohli, 4 AB de Villiers, 5 Shahbaz Ahmed, 6 Washington Sundar, 7 Daniel Sams, 8 Navdeep Saini, 9 Mohammed Siraj, 10 Kane Richardson, 11 Yuzuvender Chahal.Key gaps: Top order overseas batsman/batting allrounderPotential picks: Steven Smith, Glenn Maxwell, Shakib Al Hasan, Fabian Allen, Dawid MalanDomestic batsman/allrounder: Shahrukh Khan, Kedhar Jadhav, K GowthamSunrisers HyderabadAlong with the Kolkata Knight Riders, the Sunrisers have the smallest purse (INR 10.75 crore) in this auction. But they do not have too many gaps to fill. An overseas player is among three main vacancies. They can either look to replace Billy Stanlake, who can also act as a back-up for Jason Holder. One potential pick is likely to be buying back Shakib Al Hasan, who was with the franchise until he was banned by the ICC two years ago.ESPNcricinfo LtdCurrent first XI: 1 David Warner, 2 Jonny Bairstow, 3 Manish Pandey, 4 Priyam Garg, 5 Vijay Shankar, 6 Jason Holder, 7 Abdul Samad, 8 Rashid Khan, 9 Sandeep Sharma, 10 T Natarajan, 11 Bhuvneshwar KumarKey gap: Back-up overseas fast bowler

Sophia Dunkley seeks the power to break into England's closed-shop top six

Potential to cement a role in T20I series after fleeting return to team last summer

Matt Roller02-Mar-2021It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a batter to break into England Women’s top six. Not since Lauren Winfield-Hill, who turned 30 last year, has a debutant managed to pass 100 career runs in either ODI or T20I cricket for England, with the same core of players forming the backbone of the batting lineup for the best part of a decade.In that context, the arrival of a new batter who adds power and skill to the lower-middle order is significant, and in Sophia Dunkley, England think they might have found such a player. Dunkley was given a 10-match run in the side during the 2018-19 winter, including all five games in the T20 World Cup, but found herself on the fringes again for the next 18 months.She struggled for form in the 2019 Kia Super League, but made the most of the limited opportunities that came her way in the abbreviated season last summer. In successive innings in England’s 50-over intra-squad warm-up games, she blitzed 42 not out off 16 balls, then steered her side home with 53 not out off 64, demonstrating her versatility; in the Rachael Heyhoe Flint Trophy, she made 97 for South East Stars at Beckenham with England coach Lisa Keightley watching.The result was a recall for the final two T20Is of the summer against West Indies. Dunkley’s returns – a first-ball duck and 3 not out off 4 balls – were a reminder of the volatility of the finisher’s role, but her presence in the side was still a significant moment in her career.”It was nice to go into the summer with an open mind,” Dunkley said. “I’d been out of the side for about a year and a half, so I felt as though I had nothing to lose and I could go in with no fear and just see what happened. I played quite well, which I was really happy with, and it gave me a chance to get back into the side which was really special.”I’d been working really hard for that for the last year and a half so it was definitely a good summer for me. I got out for a duck in the first game and the last one was a five-over game, but to get back in the side and all the little things that you forget about – being on the teamsheet, being back out on the field, and feeling like you’re really part of it – was really special. I tried not to take the feeling for granted.”Sophia Dunkley pulls during the Rachael Heyhoe Flint Trophy•Getty ImagesHaving been overlooked throughout the 50-over leg of the tour to New Zealand, Dunkley hopes that she will be given another opportunity to prove herself during the T20I series, which starts on Wednesday in Wellington. England are hardly short on batting depth, with Katherine Brunt, Sarah Glenn and Sophie Ecclestone all powerful lower-order hitters, but Dunkley’s ability to go hard from early on in her innings could see her backed ahead of Winfield-Hill and Fran Wilson at No. 6.”It’s about trying to keep perspective,” Dunkley said. “A lot of the batters in the team are quite a lot older and more experienced than me. It’s about trying to be the best I can be, and if I do get an opportunity, then I’ll be giving it a good go. Hopefully at some point in the future I’ll cement a spot in the team but I’ll have to wait and see what happens and keep enjoying it along the way.”I’ve been working hard over the winter so hopefully I’ve got a good chance of keeping that spot. I think it’s part and parcel of cricket and being a young player. Just watching a few of the girls in the nets gives you a good idea of where you want to be – seeing people like Nat [Sciver] and Heather [Knight] bat is a good visualisation of what you want to be in the future.”Dunkley’s ability with the ball should also count in her favour, though she admits her legspin is still a work in progress. She will have plenty of opportunities to work on it next summer – she signed a regional contract with South East Stars at the end of last year, and was top of Charlotte Edwards’ recruitment list at Southern Brave in the Hundred – but hopes that offering a sixth or seventh bowling option will stand her in good stead down the line.”I need a lot more game-time with the ball, in the domestic system and in the Hundred, but I’ve been working really hard in training and it’s been good bowling against high-class batters on tour,” she said. “Hopefully the new set-up bridges the gap and produces a really strong pool of girls to choose from, which will raise everybody’s standards and bring in a lot more competition for places.”Related

Sophia Dunkley does it again with assured maiden ODI innings

All-round Natalie Sciver puts England Women 1-0 up

Dunkley 97 sees South East Stars to maiden victory

Rainford-Brent: 'This summer has blown a lid off the problem'

England back opening combo of Beaumont and Wyatt

If Dunkley is handed a chance this week, she will be watched particularly closely by Ebony Rainford-Brent, a long-term mentor in her role as director of women’s cricket at Surrey. Dunkley was the first woman of colour since Rainford-Brent in 2008 to make a T20I debut for England, and became an ambassador for Rainford-Brent’s African-Caribbean Engagement (ACE) Programme last year.”Ebony has done an amazing job to promote a lot of positivity and bring people together,” Dunkley said. “I’ve been really lucky with the experiences I’ve had, and haven’t experienced any abuse or anything like that, but to hear other people’s stories last year made me want to help in any way I could.”I think [the English game] is probably not in the place that it wants to be now, but I’m sure that in the next few years it will get better and better, and hopefully we’ll see a massive shift. If I can be a role model and spread as much positivity as I can around the subject, then I’d love that to help. I think just playing for England and representing the community will have a big impact – hopefully a really positive one.”

India's Newlands nemeses: Risky full length, SA's height and home edge, the Jadeja void

Kohli conceded India couldn’t get themselves to “more comprehensive or dominating positions” with the bat

Karthik Krishnaswamy14-Jan-20226:04

How did India let their advantage slip against South Africa?

When the final day of a three-Test series begins with the teams locked 1-1, and with one team needing eight wickets for victory and the other 111 runs, on a pitch where both outcomes are equally plausible, you can safely say that the gap between the two teams is a narrow one, no matter what the final outcome is.This was true even after South Africa wrapped up their second successive seven-wicket win to complete a come-from-behind series victory. As in the second Test in Johannesburg, their margin of victory in Cape Town was probably slightly misleading. Both teams were playing five-bowler combinations, and in the first three innings, the last six wickets had fallen for the addition of 56, 51 and 46 runs, respectively.Had India found an opening early on this fourth day, the result, and the series scoreline, could have been very different.Related

Talking points: Spotlight on Kohli the batter, Rahul's slot, and India's bowling combination

The rise of Petersen, the wisdom of Elgar and a great SA victory

Cricket needs to start valuing selectors more highly than coaches

Stats – South Africa first team to win a three-match Test series without scoring 250

Kohli bemoans India's batting collapse: 'There's no running away from it'

India didn’t find that opening, however, and when a team loses back-to-back Test matches in a similar manner, you might wonder if there’s more to those results than coincidence. Here, then, are three factors that possibly contributed to India’s defeat.India gamble on all-out attack
India bowled 13.2 overs before the day’s first drinks break, and conceded 47 runs. That’s just over 3.5 runs an over, a healthy scoring rate in Test cricket, especially for a side in South Africa’s position at the start of play.If you watched how that hour unfolded, however, it was clear this wasn’t the result of loose bowling. On the contrary, it felt like a wicket could fall at any moment, with Jasprit Bumrah and Mohammed Shami pitching the ball up and swinging it around corners. Of the 80 balls India bowled before the drinks break, 20 drew false shots. That’s one in four balls.There was swing available, and India looked to pitch the ball up and maximise its effect. It worked, if only in the sense of discomfiting South Africa’s batters. There is an element of subjectivity in ESPNcricinfo’s length data, but it’s still instructive. Seven of the 18 balls that India pitched on the full length in this period drew not-in-control responses. But luck was on South Africa’s side, with both Keegan Petersen and Rassie van der Dussen getting beaten on the drive without their edges being found, and slicing and edging the ball through gaps in the cordon.And when bowlers look to bowl full, they also run the risk of overpitching, and Petersen and van der Dussen also found the boundary with smooth drives through the covers in this period.So even as the full length drew the most uncertainty from South Africa’s batters (a control percentage of 61 compared to 79 for good-length balls), it was also the most expensive length, with 18 balls producing 21 runs.7:09

Kohli: ‘We did not apply enough pressure on South Africa’

It’s the natural risk of bowling an all-out-attacking length, even when the ball swings – as this deep dive into Test-match lengths by the former England analyst Nathan Leamon illustrates beautifully – but on another day, the false shots India drew may have led to the early opening they craved.The question does arise, though, whether India may have been better served hammering away on a good length and waiting to create chances while keeping a tighter lid on the scoring. Perhaps India’s best phase of the day came during a 45-minute window either side of the drinks break, when they pulled their length back slightly.Bumrah created a clear-cut chance with extra lift from a good length, only for Cheteshwar Pujara to shell a straightforward chance at first slip. Shami and Shardul Thakur then caused constant problems while conceding just three runs in the space of seven overs, during which Petersen inside-edged a good-length ball onto his stumps.But South Africa were already well on course by then, needing just 55 at that stage with seven wickets in hand, and Temba Bavuma put away a couple of rare loose balls in the first over of a new spell from Bumrah to jam the door shut on India.Bounce is a double-edged sword
There was another reason why India looked to bowl full in the morning. Given how much the ball was bouncing on this surface, it was the only way to bring lbw into play.South Africa took all their 20 wickets through catches – a first in Test cricket. Bumrah took two of his first-innings wickets via bowleds, but none of India’s other wickets had involved the stumps. All their lbw appeals had either been turned down on the field or upheld only to be overturned on review – much to their chagrin on one occasion late on day three.So futile did their quest for lbw become that at one point on this fourth day, Umesh Yadav got one to nip back at the crease-bound van der Dussen and strike his pad within the line of the stumps, only to turn around and begin walking back to his mark without bothering to appeal. It was clearly, clearly going to bounce over the stumps.Why then did India keep trying to attack the stumps and bowl fuller lengths, when South Africa’s quicks had derived so much success from hitting the pitch hard and extracting steep bounce?There were two reasons for this. Bowlers groove their lengths and their modes of attack over years and years, and it’s not straightforward to shift to an entirely different mode of operation in the middle of a tour. And South Africa’s fast bowlers, as in Johannesburg, came into this Test match with a clear advantage in height, as well as the advantage of these being their home conditions.South Africa’s fast bowlers came into this Test match with a clear advantage in height•AFP via Getty Images”We have different strengths,” Virat Kohli said at his post-match press conference. “So to compare their bowlers to ours will not be correct, because the kind of help that we get on all pitches across the world, I don’t think any other bowling attack is able to do that at the current moment, and precisely why we have been so successful everywhere in the world.”Our strengths are different, we probably bowl at different areas and there are many different ways to pick up wickets, so I think it’s important to focus on your strength as a team. Appreciate what the opposition did well, they exploited the conditions with their pace and bounce, which obviously they’ve grown up in these conditions, they know these pitches so well and which areas to bowl at, and consistently hit those areas, so you have to give them credit for that, but at the same time, you have to understand your strengths and keep sticking to it, and understand that that has gotten those results in the past, so that should hold you in good stead even moving forward.”On pitches with plenty of bounce in Australia, India have won two successive Test series while attacking the stumps far more consistently than their opposition.And while South Africa clearly made their home advantage count in this series, with their fast bowlers finishing with a collective average of 20.13 as compared to India’s 24.58, it wasn’t a mismatch, as it had been when India were the home side in 2019-20. Then, India’s quicks had averaged 17.50 and South Africa’s 70.20.Did India have enough to defend?
While there was a small but eventually significant gap between the two attacks, could India have done more with the bat to mitigate it? South Africa’s bowling was unplayable at times, particularly on the third morning when brutal lifters from Marco Jansen and Kagiso Rabada made short work of Cheteshwar Pujara and Ajinkya Rahane. But on this pitch, the ball had misbehaved less as it became older – an observation that Bumrah made during his press conference at the end of day two – and there was one critical phase during India’s second innings when their batters may have played a part in their own downfall.Kohli had battled his way to 29 off 142 balls while following a similar template to his first-innings 79, avoiding drives unless the ball was pitched right up. While runs were coming at a drip from his end, Rishabh Pant was scoring freely, and they had put on 94 for the fifth wicket.At that point, Kohli drove away from his body and nicked Lungi Ngidi to second slip. R Ashwin and Shardul Thakur, India’s allrounders at Nos. 7 and 8, also fell in similar fashion during the same spell, driving away from their body at Ngidi’s outswingers. Ashwin sliced one to gully soon after he had edged a similar shot and been dropped in the slips.R Ashwin fell to Lungi Ngidi in the second innings at Newlands•AFP via Getty ImagesThese were probably the lapses of concentration that Kohli pointed to as match-changing events during the post-match presentation.”One of the challenges we have faced over the years touring abroad has been to make sure that we capitalise on the momentum when it’s on our side,” he said. “When we do that, we’ve won Test matches quite a bit away from home as well. But when we haven’t – we’ve actually had lapses in concentration which have been quite bad, and those have actually cost us a Test match completely.”Half an hour, 45 minutes of… you could say lack of application at times. Quality bowling from the opposition as well this series. But that’s what we basically boil it down to. We’ve had a few collapses now which have cost us important moments, and eventually Test matches.”Coming into this series, India were without Ravindra Jadeja, whom they now view as a full-fledged batting allrounder in overseas conditions, even batting him ahead of Pant at times. Ashwin has batted at No. 6 for India before, but his batting has fallen away quite a bit in the years since.Ashwin’s batting has gained some of its old sparkle over the last year or so, though, and one of the contributing factors has been the freedom of his attacking game against the fast bowlers. His counterattack in the first innings of the Kanpur Test against New Zealand was full of off-side drives against Tim Southee’s outswinger – at a time when he was running through India’s middle and lower order – and Ashwin may have been attempting the same sort of thing against Ngidi at Newlands.But he can occupy the crease, too – as he showed so memorably at the SCG last year – and with Pant scoring fluently at the other end, he may reflect that this may have been a more prudent approach.As it happened, those three Ngidi wickets transformed the game, and India, who had looked on course to set a target of at least 250, ended up setting one of 212.”When we say batting line-up we obviously add the lower middle order also to it,” Kohli said in his press conference. “It’s not just focusing on four guys or five guys, it’s till No. 7, potentially 8 as well, to make sure that we get the runs required to be put on the board, so that’s a collective responsibility I’m speaking of, and everyone knows it.”Everyone knows that they haven’t quite stepped up and put in the performances that would have driven us into more comprehensive or dominating positions, and that’s basically what I understood as to why we ended up losing the two Test matches, because collectively again, we just lost too many wickets in one session, that we have done a few times in the past as well.”While Ashwin and Thakur both contributed useful scores during this series, India will know they are both essentially No. 8s at this stage of their careers, and the two of them together don’t quite make up for the absence of Jadeja.

Facing Warne: the magic, the theatre, and the whole shebang

Dravid, Jayawardene, Bell, Lara, Younis, Tendulkar and Kirsten recall the time they had to pit their skills against the greatest legspinner of all time

Nagraj Gollapudi29-Mar-2022’For him every ball was a contest’ – Rahul DravidOne of the things that always stood out playing against Warnie was that it felt like he was always setting you up for something, like a cat-and-mouse game was always on. Just when you felt, ‘I am going to go inside out,’ he would bowl the flipper. Or the moment you thought he’s tied me down and maybe I need to play the sweep or use my feet, he would bowl just the ball that would make that particular shot risky. Like he almost knew what you were going to do. It felt like a set-up.And that was always the challenge. It didn’t feel like someone was just wheeling away at one end, bowling good balls and dot balls and trying to create pressure and then get you out. It always felt like he had a plan. There was something going on in his head where it felt like he was out-thinking you. As much as you were in a contest of bat and ball, you were also in a mental duel with him.Personally, the challenge of playing Warnie was greater in Australia than in India because of the bounce there and the drift he got due to the wind. Both those factors accentuated his strengths in some ways. The other challenge was he was always getting me to play around my pad. As a batter you pick a line and then commit to it, but as you committed the ball would drift and I always felt I played around it.So, I made a conscious effort to try and ensure that I was not playing around my pad and that I didn’t commit that early to the line, that I waited a fraction of a second more than any other legspinner I played. It didn’t always work and he got me out a few times. He is not the only spinner that I played who got drift but Warnie was the most consistent.He could also bowl these big spinning legbreaks, pitching on off stump spinning away. He would do that for an over or two sometimes. He had you committed to that line and suddenly he’d bowl this ball which started on the off-stump, would go towards middle, and because you had played so many balls going towards off he has got you playing around the pad and is spinning across you. That was the hallmark of Warnie. We saw it with the [Mike] Gatting ball. We saw it with the [VVS] Laxman ball [in Bangalore in 2004]. And so many other such balls. However good you were, even towards the end of his career, when Warnie got that drift right, it was a challenge to play him.4:34

Dravid: ‘What amazed me was the amount of time he spent discussing cricket’

There was also this sense of theatre. For him every ball was a contest. It was not just a game of patience. A lot of times you hear that: let’s bowl dot balls, let’s bowl maidens, let’s just put the pressure on. That did not mean Warnie was not good at doing that. In fact, he had the ability to bowl defensively, as in that 2004 series in India when the Australian seamers were bowling really well and Warnie needed to block up one end. That was probably the difference between the 2004 and 2001 series in India: in 2004, he bowled more defensively and learned to be just boring, which maybe was against his nature a little because he wanted to do things, he wanted to set you up all time. But probably, and this is conjecture on my part, Warnie realised that he could bowl 30 overs in a day and dry up one end so that the fast bowlers could be rotated.But, for a large part, you were in a contest with a guy who was trying to out-skill and out-think you. Warnie had that ability to get you out and not rely only on your mistakes. Both of us played a lot against each other and he got me out a few times and I might have had a little bit of success against him, but it never felt like you were in absolute control of that contest. I knew he had the skills, nous and tactics to get me out.Warnie changed the whole theatre of Test cricket with his personality, his presence, his performance. He changed the way Test cricket was being watched from the 90s when it was all about watching fast bowlers at a time when a lot of attritional cricket was on display. Warnie just made legspin and spin-bowling more attacking. Not that there were not great spinners before him, but Warnie’s growth coincided with the expansion of the influence of television and technology in the game. That brought Warnie to the fore.He changed the narrative around Test cricket: from being all about fast bowling to spin bowling. That spin bowling is match-winning. And there was no better example than Warnie: he became man in a bowling attack with McGrath, Gillespie and Lee. I can’t pay a greater compliment to Warnie.’His presence was extraordinary and more powerful than anyone’ – Ian BellGrowing up, when playing cricket in the garden with my brother, I would often pretend to be Shane Warne. As he was to so many others, Warnie was one of my heroes. You can therefore imagine how surreal and nerve-wracking it was to face him for England in 2005.I was 22 (23) years old, playing my first Ashes, and I had no idea what was going to hit me. Until you step into a high-profile series like the Ashes you don’t understand its magnitude. I felt I was equipped and had plans to deal with occasion, but in truth it got the better of me and I ended up playing the man and not the ball.All of a sudden, I was facing Shane Warne, this guy I’d idolised for so many years and who was rightly considered one of the best players in the world.Getty ImagesLooking back, I probably paid him too much respect in that series and never really found a way to relieve the pressure and put it back on him. His presence in the middle was extraordinary and certainly more powerful than anyone I’d so far encountered. While the wickets were quite flat, with not a huge amount of spin, he still found a way of making it difficult for us by changing the fields, slowing the tempo down, and generally asking questions of the batter. Being the very good poker player he was, it was like he was double bluffing us in certain ways. That was a massive skill of his. He made sure everyone was geared to his tempo and what he wanted to do.Whether he was attacking or defending, he made young players like me start to think more about what he was thinking, than simply watching the ball and reacting to what comes down. In 2005 I certainly overthought it and consequently couldn’t take advantage when that bad ball did finally come.Ironically though, I always felt I was a good player of spin. I loved using my feet. When you are playing against the very best spinners, like Murali and Warnie, you can’t just sit there and survive. You have to be proactive. You have to find a way of putting their lengths under pressure. You have to find a way of moving the fielder and being a bit brave. In that 2005 Ashes, I was not brave enough.My average against Warnie in that series was 19, who got me out three times. Interestingly though, in my second Ashes, on the 2006-07 trip to Australia, I had an average of 61 against him. What changed? Basically, I had grown as a Test match player, having played against the great Pakistan and India teams. I had learnt a huge amount and was in a far better place with my game by the time we landed down under. Australia isn’t actually the easiest place for spinners – there is nice consistent bounce so you can play off the back foot, and you can come down the wicket and hit through the line of the ball. That shows just what a superstar Warnie was. He did it everywhere.Related

Legspinners look back at Shane Warne's ball of the century: 'That delivery will always be the pinnacle'

Shane Warne Stand unveiled as MCG crowd bids their hero an emotional farewell

Warne gave us so much and he had so much more to give

What Warne's greatest deliveries tell us

Warne's magic was made for television

And he never gave up. A lot has been said about the whole ‘Sherminator’ sledge and it became a lot bigger than it actually was, but it was just an example of Warnie using all the tricks in his locker. In Adelaide I had started scoring runs against him and we had raised a big first-innings total. It was not frustration on his part. Far from it, in fact. He was just utilising all the rich resources he had at his disposal. He was not shy at coming at me a bit harder and I don’t blame him one bit. He was quite simply a competitor who did what he needed to help his team.We ended up losing that Adelaide Test and it was down to Warnie’s magic. The wicket was particularly flat and we should have never lost having scored 500-plus in the first innings. But again it was Warnie who created the belief in his own team that they could win that game. He was an absolute genius.Many will have opinions about what was Warnie’s strongest attribute, and all of them will be right because he had so many, but for me it was his natural variation that I found hardest to combat. Because of his accuracy and his grip, and his ability to put so many revs on the ball, he could get one to hit the seam and really spin, and the next one would just slide on. That, of course, and his ability to hit great areas consistently more than any other leg spinner.Shane Warne was the best bowler I played against in my Test career and for me the greatest player ever to play the game. His ability to control the environment, that big stage, whether Lord’s, the MCG, wherever, was truly remarkable. As an opposing batter it always felt like he was the conductor and more often than not we were just playing his tune. It was a privilege to have shared the field with the King and the whole cricketing world will miss him enormously.’He was always trying to figure out how he could dismiss you’ – Sachin TendulkarAustralia’s tour of India in 1998 was my first proper Test series against Shane. Everyone had tagged that series as Tendulkar vs Shane Warne. I had to remind people that it was India vs Australia, but such was the following. Obviously, that is going to put you under pressure – you are playing a world class bowler like Shane Warne so you can’t turn up and hope that things are going to be okay. One had to prepare properly, not just being out there in the nets, but also when you are sitting in the room you have to try and be a step ahead of what he would be thinking, because he was extremely good at putting pressure and playing mind games and trying to plan your dismissal.1:16

Tendulkar: ‘Warne could spin the ball from day one on Australian surfaces’

If you looked at his body language one didn’t know whether Warne had picked four wickets, five wickets or was wicketless. Every delivery he bowled, he was a fierce competitor. So even if facing the second-last or last over of the day, one had to keep his eyes open because he was always up to something and trying to figure out how he could dismiss you.In my career, I played a number of good spinners, but Shane was different. He was one of those very, very few bowlers, against whom you could not hit the ball on the rise. There were a number of spinners against whom you could go and play on the rise when you are batting well, but Shane was someone, if you didn’t get to the pitch of the ball, there was no way one was expected to drive on the rise.I felt that was his class, the way he got the ball to drift. And that can only happen if you have strong shoulders and you are giving it a rip – the ball drifts down leg and then it is leaving you, spinning away from you. Not many bowlers could do that in world cricket. There were some great spinners around, but Shane was without any doubt different.I had to also practise differently because till then nobody had bowled round the wicket in the rough, trying to get you out. Round the wicket in the rough or left-arm over the wicket in the rough was usually bowled to keep things under control if the batter was scoring runs quickly. But Shane was actually looking to get the batter out. So I had to prepare what were my defensive options and what were my attacking options.’Even in white-ball cricket Warnie was the king’ – Mahela JayawardeneWhen it came to creating pressure, Warnie was a master. I first played him in 1999 during our home series against Australia. As a 20-something facing Warnie, at his peak, for the first time was definitely a challenge. Straightway you could gauge his intelligence in how he set up his fields, getting batters to hit certain gaps so he could look at getting them out. And in conditions he couldn’t control, he would manoeuvre fielders around. For a batter it was a constant battle.I remember in that Kandy Test how he opened up the midwicket gap when I was in my 40s and that tempted me to charge Warnie – the leading edge went straight to the fielder. He understood that the young cricketer has an ego and thinks: “I’m going to hit Warnie through the gap”. On a turning wicket, for a right-hander, that was risky, but that was the kind of mindset Warnie possessed.3:30

Lara: ‘Warne never gave up, he always produced that miracle delivery’

It was fascinating to watch from the outside how Warnie made his plans and went about a Test. He would put his head down and do his job, play the defensive role on the first day wicket, but come the latter half of the Test – days four and five – he would take control and be the man to do the job, take the pressure on. He had skills that you rarely saw, along with temperament and intelligence.Even in white-ball cricket Warnie was the king. He enjoyed the challenge because batters came at him and it was easier for him. He never backed off. He knew he could get a wicket when the team needed it – take the 1999 World Cup semi-finals. He loved those big matches.He started to play T20 cricket towards the backend of his career when he was taking wickets not with his skills, but with his head. That might have been a far better and enjoyable challenge for him because he would talk to you and troll you on the field. Whether you heard him or not, he was trying to create a situation for the batter to trap him.For me, more than the skills, Warnie the person was important. He was an entertainer. He taught us to enjoy being who you are. Yes, he was a target (for the tabloid media), but he did not want to change; he enjoyed life on and off the field and that was what he was. I don’t think you would see Shane Warne the entertainer on the field if he did not enjoy life outside and be the person that he was.The image that will stay with me is from last year’s Hundred in England where he was head coach at London Spirit. Not just his team, but he was helping spinners from all other franchises. He genuinely loved cricket. He contributed to the game tremendously, in a very positive way, both when he ruled on the field, and even after retirement. That is what we all should remember Warnie for.’He didn’t need to be a captain to be a leader’ – Younis KhanThe thing about Shane Warne was that he knew he was a match-winner. That kind of character that he didn’t need to be a captain to be a leader. He led Rajasthan Royals to the title in that first IPL and as I was there, I saw up close what his captaincy was about.As a bowler he had this great ability to create something from nothing, to play with the batter’s psyche when there wasn’t much happening. He didn’t just stick to one plan or style, he was always creating things, doing different things with the ball, trying fields. Talking about his bowling is like [like holding a candle to the sun – stating the obvious]. Everyone knows how great he was.If anything helped it was that I began myself as a leggie and so I understood the psyche a little. But he was such a great bowler that it wasn’t as if it was easy to play him and whenever I did score runs, I didn’t play freely against him.Getty ImagesI remember the Colombo Test (in 2002-03), I knew he would come at me from different angles. During practice, whenever I got a chance I would make a rough patch in different areas on the pitch and then get Danish Kaneria to bowl at me there. Whenever I had any free time, I would practice only against legspin, not fast bowling. That was his presence that you would practice like that. From round the wicket, from over, from out of the rough, from out of somewhere else. I knew on these surfaces Shane Warne would make us struggle.Sweeping Warne, or playing across the line, was never easy. His floater (the one that went straight) I can say confidently, was one of the best ever. He finished the careers of top batters with it. When you sweep a spinner, he gets annoyed. As a batter, the one tactic against someone like Warne, when you want to play a sweep, if you saw the line of the ball outside off, you knew, ok I can sweep this. When he again came to a conventional line I could revert. But as a top bowler, you have to have plans, you have to think tactically always. And Shane Warne, wherever he went, he always had plans, and more plans beyond that.Of course, to be as dominant as he was, it’s not just skills but you have to be a total package. And Warne was that, not just a bowler, or a leader, but the total package. He was the kind of guy, whenever you thought you had worked something out about him, you realised there was another page, and then another, and then another. He was a book, with many pages and whenever you turned a page, you were surprised by what you saw on that page.It was an honour to play against him and we knew that whenever we did, we would learn plenty from the experience. All of Pakistan, the world was a fan of Shane Warne and all cricket lovers around the world will miss him.’He was unpacking your technique while you were batting’ – Gary KirstenWhat made it difficult to score runs off Warnie was his consistency. He was able to bowl at a good pace, at a good trajectory because he was such a strong guy. It made it difficult to use your feet against him. He just had a great ability, especially when there was a little bit more on the match or when the game was on the line, to deliver his best balls under pressure.Getty ImagesThat was what probably separated him from other bowlers. That’s why I say he was the toughest competitor I came across. What he also did well was when you were in the contest with him, and you could almost sense this and feel it as it was happening, that he was always looking for ways that he could get you out. It was almost like he was unpacking your technique while you were batting there. He was working out different ways to end your time at the crease.He never just allowed the game to drift. He was always looking for a creative way at getting batters out. That was a real strength. He hated it when the game was allowed to drift or individuals just allowed the game to flow and wait for the batter to make the mistake. It wasn’t part of his DNA. You always felt when you were batting against him that you were never in. It wasn’t like there was a period of time when you felt you were on top of him. There were moments where I felt I was doing okay, but he would always come back stronger.Naturally it was also dependent on the pitch. When the wicket got really worn out, in the third and fourth innings, that was when his artistry really took over because he knew that he could exploit the conditions with his accuracy and make it really tough for batters to defend especially in Tests. And equally he liked an aggressive approach which some batters would use to unsettle him, which almost got him going a little more. So, it was about trying to find the balance between defending well against him and trying to score. But Warnie was always competing and looking to get you out.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus